logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 청주지방법원 2018.07.11 2017나3308
추심금
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Reasons

1. The reasons for the court's explanation of this case are as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the first instance except for the rejection of each of the statements and images as stated in Gap evidence Nos. 13 through 19 (including serial numbers), which is insufficient to recognize that C has a claim for return, tree, landscape trees, etc. equivalent to the sales price claimed by the plaintiff against the defendant as additional evidence submitted by this court, and thus, it is identical to the reasoning of the judgment of the first instance. Thus, it is acceptable in accordance with the text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. In conclusion, the judgment of the court of first instance is legitimate, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow