logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2016.08.25 2016나50945
소유권이전등기
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is all dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

Reasons

The reasoning for the court's explanation on the instant case is that the reasoning for the judgment of the court of first instance is as follows, except for the rejection of each statement or image of Gap evidence Nos. 13 through 18 (including a serial number), which is insufficient to recognize "the plaintiff, directly or indirectly, possessed the instant land and the instant forest for not less than 20 years through the succession of possession (in particular, the fact that the plaintiff has occupied the instant land and the instant forest by indirect possession through Nonparty S and U)" as evidence submitted in addition to the trial, since it is the same as the reasons for the judgment of the court of first instance pursuant to the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

Therefore, the judgment of the court of first instance is legitimate, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow