All appeals by the Defendants are dismissed.

1. In light of the summary of the grounds for appeal in this case’s sentencing conditions, the lower court’s punishment (for the accused, four months of imprisonment and one year of suspended execution) is too unreasonable.

2. It is recognized that the Defendants led to confession and reflect all of the instant crimes, and that the Defendants did not have the same criminal record.

However, since illegal game room business has a great impact on society, such as encouraging an excessive gambling spirit to the general public and hindering sound labor awareness, the crime of participation in the business of the game room of this case requires strict punishment, and the degree of participation in the business of the game room of this case by Defendant A is not somewhat less than one month, and Defendant B committed the crime of this case again while serving as an employee of the game room of this case as well as the fact that Defendant B was suspended from indictment for the same crime, and did not commit the crime of this case again, it cannot be deemed that the lower court’s punishment is too unreasonable, taking into account all the sentencing conditions, such as the Defendants’ age, character and behavior, environment, motive, circumstance

3. As such, the Defendants’ appeal is without merit, and all of them are dismissed pursuant to Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.