beta
Text
The judgment below
The part against the Defendants is reversed.
Defendant
A Imprisonment with prison labor of one year and two months, and Defendant B.
Reasons
1. Summary of grounds for appeal;
A. The punishment of each sentence (one year and six months of imprisonment, two years of suspended execution, two years of probation, community service, 120 hours of imprisonment) sentenced by the court below against the Defendants is too unreasonable.
B. It is unreasonable that the prosecutor's court below did not confiscate the building of the massage treatment place in this case where the defendant D had attempted to commit the crime and its site against the defendant.
2. Determination:
A. (1) The crime of arranging sexual traffic in this case is highly harmful to the society since the crime of arranging sexual traffic in this case is highly likely to harm the sound sex culture and good morals, etc. The defendant committed the crime of this case repeatedly for a long time without being aware of the suspension of the execution of the same crime, the crime of this case is planned and organized by the defendant A, and the benefits acquired by the defendant A through the crime of this case are significant. However, in light of the fact that the defendant A is recognized as the charge of this case, the sentence of sentence is inevitable for the defendant A to the defendant, but there is no record of the sentence for the defendant A to support his wife and his child, the sentencing cases for similar cases, the sentencing cases for the defendant A, the age, character and conduct of the defendant, the environment, family relations, etc. after the crime of this case, the defendant A's assertion that the defendant A's punishment of this case is unfair.
(2) As to the assertion of Defendant B and D, Defendant B and D recognized the facts charged of the instant case and reflects their depth, Defendant B and D did not have any criminal records exceeding the fine, Defendant B did not have the same criminal records, Defendant B was given monthly salary to Defendant A, the owner of the instant business, and Defendant B was an employee of the instant sexual traffic business establishment.