logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2017.04.20 2017고정510
공전자기록등불실기재등
Text

Defendants shall be punished by a fine of KRW 4,000,000.

The Defendants did not pay each of the above fines.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is a person of naturalization in Vietnam with the nationality of the Republic of Korea, and Defendant B is a person of de facto marital relationship with Defendant A with a Vietnam nationality foreigner.

1. When Defendant A was aware of the fact that Defendant B, a foreigner of Vietnam, who was a foreigner of de facto marital relationship, entered the Republic of Korea and was aware of the disguised marriage and false marriage or false marriage report by Vietnam, while seeking ways to live together, Defendant B, who was a foreigner of de facto marital relationship by false marriage report, requested Defendant B to arrange a disguised marriage or false marriage report by Defendant B on condition that USD 12,000 should be paid. Defendant B and C recruited Defendant B as a citizen of the Republic of Korea who was aware of false marriage or false marriage report by false marriage report.

As above, the Defendants conspired with D and C to prepare and deliver documents necessary for filing a marriage report to C, and C shall deliver them to D, and D shall be a de facto marital information processing system in Geumcheon-gu Seoul Metropolitan City, Geumcheon-gu, Seoul, around December 26, 2011, the facts at the public service center of the public office of Geumcheon-gu, Seoul, which is 73-gil70, as the city of Geumcheon-gu, Seoul, is the de facto marital relationship couple, and Defendant B and D did not intend to marry. Despite the fact that Defendant B and D had they married normally, they prepared a marriage report as they did not wish to marry, and submitted it to the public official in charge of registration of family relations relations to enter the false facts in the public electronic records processing system, and immediately had the above public official store and operate the family information processing system stating the false facts as above.

Accordingly, in collusion with D and C, the Defendants made a false report to the public official to enter false facts in the official electronic records and exercised it.

2. Any person who violates the Immigration Control Act;

arrow