Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, each of the above defendants is against the defendants for one year from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant B was a person who was married to E on November 1, 2012, and was married to the Defendant, around May 27, 2013, at a room where it is impossible to identify the custody room of the Helel in front of the G basin located in F in the Namyang-si, Namyang-si, and the Defendant was sexual intercourse with A over 70 times from around that time to August 14, 2013, as indicated in the attached Table (criminal list).

2. Defendant A knew that he was a spouse of the above B, the date and place indicated in the attached Form (crime List) and the sexual intercourse B with B and 70 times.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ legal statement

1. Each police interrogation protocol against the Defendants

1. Statement to E by the police;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to the complaint;

1. Article 241(1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting a crime;

1. Aggravation of concurrent crimes (defendants) Articles 37 (former part), 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (i.e., the fact that the defendant is against his/her will);