(영문) 수원지방법원 2018.09.13 2018노2273 | 리걸엔진

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 수원지방법원 2018.09.13 2018노2273

강제추행

Text

The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (misunderstanding of facts) shall be the victim of an indecent act;

Comprehensively taking account of the evidence and various circumstances revealed through the evidence submitted by the prosecution, such as the fact that the victim consistently makes a statement, the victim’s flick immediately after the Defendant was disturbed, the fact that the victim committed an indecent act by the victim, following the Defendant’s immediately following the instant crime, and the Defendant’s escape, etc., can be acknowledged.

The lower court acquitted the Defendant of the facts charged.

2. Determination

A. On October 9, 2017, the Defendant: (a) committed an indecent act by force against the victim’s right knife with the victim F (n, 17 years of age, 17 years of age); (b) the victim’s knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife kn

B. In full view of the following circumstances, the lower court determined that the Defendant had contacted the victim’s her mare with the intention to engage in the commission.

It is difficult to conclude that there is no other evidence to acknowledge it, and it is judged not guilty of the charges.

1) At the time of entering the facts charged in the instant case, it seems clear that the Defendant’s hand, at the time of entering the instant facts charged, had contacted the victim’s her son’s side side.

In this regard, the victim seems to have some difficulties in accurately expressing the strength and attitude of the contact.

When the victim prepares a written statement to an investigative agency on the day of the instant case or prepares a written statement, the method of contact was “welve.”

“ .......”

In the prosecution after a month, at the time when the defendant was examined in comparison with the defendant, the victim “as we see the side side of her mar, the victim came up one time above as we see the next mar.

“The prosecutor made a statement, and the police made the statement from the prosecutor to the police.

Whether the statements were made or not

and at the time when they are asked.

유사 판례

-수원지방법원 2018.03.29 2017고단7726

-수원지방법원 2017.10.26 2017노1065

-서울동부지방법원 2016.10.13 2016노412

-대전지방법원서산지원 2020.12.14 2020고정189

-서울중앙지방법원 2018.11.30 2018고단5592