Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment without prison labor for eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving of a C Poter cargo vehicle.

On October 14, 2017, the Defendant continued the roads in front of the E station located in Seojin-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City around 08:30 on October 14, 2017 to the front station of the stadium-gu.

At the same time, signal lights and crosswalks are installed on the front door of the location, so in such cases, the driver of the vehicle has a duty of care to prevent accidents by observing the traffic laws and regulations, and by accurately operating the steering direction and brake system.

Nevertheless, the Defendant’s failure to perform the above duty of care, while proceeding beyond the stop line, brought about the victim F (M. 72 years old) who dried the crosswalk in accordance with the pedestrian signals, and was found late due to the negligence in the course of business that found the victim of the above cargo vehicle due to the negligence in the course of business, and suffered injury, such as melting the pipe of the large 6 weeks of treatment, etc., to the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A traffic accident report;

1. Statement hearing report;

1. Investigation report (related to the cause of accident);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of a medical certificate;

1. Relevant Article 3 (1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents and Special Cases concerning the Selection of Punishment, the proviso to Article 3 (2) 1 and 6 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, and Article 268 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. The punishment as ordered shall be determined by taking into account various sentencing conditions, such as the fact that the defendant's reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act reflects his mistake, the fact that there is no record of crime exceeding the fine, and the recent five million won deposit for the victim, etc.