logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 2017.11.01 2017고단2522
교통사고처리특례법위반(치상)
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of five million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Criminal facts

On April 25, 2017, the Defendant, who is engaged in driving of Churd passenger vehicles, was driving the said passenger vehicle around 17:55 on April 25, 2017, and was driving the front of D in front of the Kimhae-si at the same distance from the surface of the road inside the east of the east-do.

At the time, the Defendant showed to cross the above road by the victim E (V, 80 years old). As such, a person engaged in driving service has a duty of care to check and drive the safety of the victim or safety after reducing the speed and taking into account his attitude.

However, the defendant neglected this and did not avoid the victim crossing the road from the right-hand side of the defendant's proceeding to the left-hand side, and had the victim go beyond the floor.

Ultimately, the Defendant caused the victim to suffer bodily injury, such as melting the boom of the 10-day booms, which requires the victim to receive approximately 10 weeks of treatment due to such occupational negligence.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A survey report on actual conditions;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of each written diagnosis;

1. Article 3 (1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents and Article 268 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts;

1. The reasons for sentencing under Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act, which include the following: (a) the Defendant’s mistake was pened in depth and reflected; and (b) there are some circumstances that may be taken into account the motive and background leading to the instant crime; (c) the Defendant agreed with the victim’s bereaved family members; and (d) other various conditions of sentencing as indicated in the records and arguments, including the circumstances after the instant crime, the Defendant’s age, sex behavior, intelligence, environment, criminal record relation, etc., were comprehensively considered.

arrow