1. All appeals filed by the plaintiffs are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiffs.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

1. The reasoning of the court’s explanation concerning this case is as follows: (a) the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is as stated in Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act, i.e., Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. In light of the following circumstances, the evidence as mentioned above and evidence No. 11 as well as evidence No. 11 as well as evidence No. 12, and evidence No. 1 as well as evidence No. 12 as evidence No. 1 as well as evidence No. 1 as evidence No. 1 as well as the witness I as mentioned above, the plaintiff A mainly worked as the head of the administrative office of the medical care center of this case and mainly for the management of the equipment, facilities, and employees of the medical care center of this case. Although the plaintiff was partly engaged in the work of establishing a plan for providing welfare for the elderly of this case or counseling and guiding the promotion of welfare, it cannot be deemed that the plaintiff A was working as a social worker assigned pursuant to the Enforcement Rule of the Welfare Act and the Enforcement Rule of the Act of the Aged Act. (A) The plaintiff A received a report from the head of the medical care center of this case as the head of the administrative office of the 1st floor to June 30, 2016.

(1) The plaintiff A appears to have participated in the establishment of a plan to provide welfare for older persons, such as attending the staff meeting and holding a president and a meeting at the office of the third floor of the medical care center of this case.

2. A witness of the political party may assist the plaintiff A to proceed with the program or make a written answer to the beneficiary, etc.