All appeals by the Defendants are dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. In a case where a police officer who misleads the misunderstanding of facts, arrested a flagrant offender against Defendant A as an offense of insult, and thus, during the process of refusing such unlawful performance of official duties, the Defendants used violence against police officers.

Even if the crime of interference with the performance of official duties was not established, the lower court found the Defendant guilty of the instant facts charged, thereby adversely affecting the conclusion of the judgment.

B. The sentence sentenced by the court below (2 years of suspended sentence in August, and 2 years of suspended sentence in June) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. As to the assertion of mistake of facts, the lower court stated the relevant legal doctrine in detail and stated the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence. In other words, police officers consistently and specifically stated the developments leading up to the dispatch to the investigation agency and this court, the Defendants’ horses and actions, and the arrest process of the Defendants, and there are no circumstances to suspect the Defendants. In particular, there is credibility in the statement, the Defendants and the witness K arrested Defendant A as an offender of the offense of insult of the defect after the police officer was dispatched to the 112 report, and arrested Defendant A as an offender of the offense of insult of the defect. Defendant A’s head’s satisfy on the ground floor. However, if Defendant B’s statement at the investigation agency and the court, the witness’s statement, and the relation between the Defendants and K did not take into account, it is difficult for the police officers to find that Defendant A’s report was made, and that Defendant A’s report was made without considering the following circumstances.

(2) If the performance of the duties is carried out, the