1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. The Plaintiff is a company whose business objective is the manufacturing business of measuring instruments, and the Defendant is a quasi-governmental institution under the Act on the Management of Public Institutions established for the purpose of developing electric resources under the Korea Electric Power Corporation Act (hereinafter “Public Institutions Operation Act”).

B. On October 23, 2014, the Fair Trade Commission determines 1) with respect to the Plaintiff, on the following grounds: (a) the Monopoly Regulation and Fair Trade Act (hereinafter “Fair Trade Act”) applies:

2) Decision No. 2014-237 of the Fair Trade Commission Resolution (hereinafter “instant Fair Trade Commission Resolution”) pursuant to Articles 21 and 22, etc.

) As a result, the corrective order and the payment order of 14,00,000 won was issued to the effect that “an act unreasonably restricting competition in the domestic electric power system, such as jointly determining the price and volume of the electric power system to be supplied to the owner of the order,” and that “an act unreasonably restricting competition in the domestic electric power system,” were issued. The reasons for the corrective order and the payment order of penalty: LSSP Co., Ltd.

) At the low voltage electronic power purchase tender ordered by the Defendant in 2009, one of the parties agreed (30 years 2008, 5 years 2009) on the successful tender volume and the bid price for each of the parties to the contract in the year 2008, one of the parties to the contract was participating in the purchase tender for each of the parties to the contract. At the year 2008, one of the parties participated in the bid for purchase in the 2008 LSSB, Hanjin Electric Power Co., Ltd., Ltd., the other party to the contract, the other party to the contract, the other party to the contract, and the other party to the contract, the other party to the contract, the other party to the contract, the other party to the contract, the other party to the contract, and the other party to the contract, the other party to the contract, the other party to the contract, the other party to the contract, and the other party to the contract, the other party to the contract.

The 11 company, among the above companies, including the Plaintiff, etc., was ordered from March 2009 to October 200.