Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

From 22:00 on December 19, 2010 to 0:20:0:21 on December 20, 2012, the Defendant: (a) visited the Internet “E” hosting site’s so-called “E”-called “Nansan Central East East East East East” to conduct hosting to meet the conditions and conditions of juvenile F (12 years of age) and, (b) promised to pay for commercial sex acts and have the conditions fulfilled; and (c) urged the Defendant to buy or sell sex in a way that determines the time and place of promise by using the Defendant’s cell phone conversations to induce the Defendant to commit fraud of F, a juvenile, or to sell sex.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant's oral statement at each court date, the fifth and the sixth court date;

1. The defendant's partial statement in the first protocol of trial;

1. Copies of each police interrogation protocol of G and H;

1. A copy of each police statement made to the F; and

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes on reverse call details (No. 53 pages of investigation records);

1. Article 10 (2) of the Act on the Protection of Children and Juveniles against Sexual Abuse, which stipulates the relevant criminal facts and the applicable provision of punishment for selective crimes (including the selection of fines and the absence of any record of criminal punishment);

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 13 (1) and (2) of the Act on the Protection of Children and Juveniles against Sexual Abuse;

1. The defendant who has registered personal information under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act was convicted of a violation of the Act on the Protection of Children and Juveniles against Sexual Abuse. Since the case falls under the case where the relevant juvenile is less than 13 years of age, the defendant is a person subject to registration of personal information pursuant to Article 33 of the same Act and is obligated to submit personal information to the chief of the competent police station as prescribed in Article 34 of the same Act.

Defendant

Judgment on the Defense Counsel's argument

1. The summary of the argument is true that the defendant conducted telephone conversations with F and Internet hosting, but there was no intention to purchase sex to obtain necessary data in the process of preparing a master's degree thesis.

2. Determination.