A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

Despite the fact that the Defendant is not a narcotics handler, the Defendant treated narcotics as follows:

1. On February 2, 2015, the Defendant purchased a Mefacule (one Mefacopon; hereinafter “Mefacopon”) Mefacul (one Mefacopon”) Mefacul (one Mefacopon), which is a local mental medicine, from a person who is in a non-name-facopic package in the D market located in the Busan East-gu, Busan-gu, and administered a Mefacopon by dilutioning the Mefacop (one Mecopon equivalent to five Mefacopon) among them into the Mefacul.

2. On February 2, 2015, the Defendant administered phiphones in a d market located in Busan East-gu, Busan-do (on the day following the day set forth in the foregoing paragraph 1.) by dilutioning the phiphones into a coffee and drinking them at the front of the D market located in Busan-gu, Busan-do.

3. On February 2, 2015, the Defendant administered phiphonephones in a scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic (scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopics

4. On March 25, 2015, the Defendant drinking alcohol together at G main points located in Geum-gu, Busan, Geum-gu, Busan, on March 25, 2015

H used philophones to H by dilutioning the sobroopon volume ( considerable to a single medication) by dilution.

5. On April 2015, the Defendant administered phiphonephones in a scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic (scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopics

6. On July 20, 2015, the Defendant, who was parked in the Busan East-gu apartment parking lot, the Defendant’s residence, the Busan-dong apartment parking lot, for the Defendant, administered phiphonephones in a way of dilutioning the philophones (which is equivalent to a one-time medication) with coffees within a passenger car operated by the Defendant.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the prosecution with regard to H;

1. Each police statement made against H and L;

1. Police seizure records;

1. Response to a request for appraisal (H);

1. Notifications of the results of legal and chemical appraisal (urine - both sides) 1.