1. The part against the defendant among the judgment of the court of first instance is revoked, and the plaintiff's claim corresponding to the above revoked part is revoked.

1. Basic facts

A. The Defendant is a company running the air passenger transport business, etc., and the Plaintiff purchased the airline tickets of the Incheon (ICN)-Guam (GUM) route that the Defendant works for, and on September 16, 2014, Guam-guon around 16:30, 2014

B. 원 팻 국제공항 Antonio

B. The gas of the above aircraft, which started from Won Pat International Report, is "the aircraft of this case" and "the flight of this case". The flight of this case is "the flight of this case".

B) The Plaintiff is a passenger who was scheduled to return to Korea. (B) The Plaintiff was on board the instant aircraft prior to the scheduled departure time, and thereafter, the Plaintiff was on board the instant aircraft, which was towed from the terminal cycle at around 16:26 on the same day after completing all passenger boarding procedures and closing the entrance, and prepared for take-off after being towed from the terminal cycle. In the process, the Plaintiff did not take a stop at the engine No. 1 engine (ENG VALVCE CALD) and called “offing the engine fuel valve” on the steering meter board, and called back at around 16:50 again at the end of several times at around 16:50 intervals. (c) The Plaintiff was waiting on the instant aircraft mooring at the cycle of the instant aircraft, and the Defendant was on board the instant aircraft at around 19:30 on the day when the instant aviation port became final and conclusive, and then the Defendant returned to Korea on a replacement of the instant aircraft at around 19:30 on the next scheduled scheduled date (hereinafter “On 214, 2017”).

(i) [In the absence of a dispute over the basis of recognition, Gap evidence No. 3, Eul evidence Nos. 1 and 2, the purport of the whole pleadings.

2. The parties' assertion

A. In light of the circumstances in which the Plaintiff’s aviation was determined as a gaseous defect, and only after the completion of all passenger boarding procedures, it was due to negligence by the Defendant’s neglect of maintenance or failure to properly prepare for it.

(b).