A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant, on November 13, 2016, Yangcheon-gu Seoul around 02:17

B. On the ground that the police officer C, who was under the influence of alcohol and was dispatched to the site at the taxi rate of 112 reported (referred to 2106) at the front of the taxi rate, has the Defendant pay the fare to the taxi engineer and caused the defect that the police officer C, who was dispatched to the site, paid the fare to the taxi engineer and voluntarily returned to the site, shall be subject to the education of the police officer.

Norhman shall have a limited number of people.

“In doing so, assaulted the above C’s arms which were sitting on the top of the 112th inspection vehicle.”

Accordingly, the defendant assaulted the above C, who is the police officer, and obstructed the legitimate execution of duties concerning the prevention of crime of the above C.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of the police statement protocol law to C

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the stay of execution (including the fact that the degree of violence is not much serious, and the fact that the crime is led to confession and is against it);