A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

around 05:50 on December 30, 2017, the Defendant stated that “D” entertainment drinking places in Jeju, which are located in C, drinked with the report of 112 on “D” with the content that “n't female employees and city expenses” and met with the notification, the Defendant, “I will get back KRW 20,000 won of the drinking value because I would have come to know that I would not engage in secondary (commercial sex acts)” and “F will receive a refund from the Defendant, not to help the police officer, but to be related to the business of the said entertainment drinking place.”

I would like to think, it was required to return home while guiding the Jeju Viewing Fara to the Favoire.

The Defendant shall cut off the front of the F, and shall use the F, “F.m. f. f. f. f.

2.2 5 5 1 2 2 2 2 2 22

As a result, the number of times has become a short, and how taxes can be paid.

J. 900,000 won, police officers' upper names are well aware of them.

Hexa, Doz. Doz. Doz.

The bit of bitch bitch far, “Woo”, farb, and assaulted the face of the F one time with the hand floor.

As a result, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning the handling of reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police with regard to F;

1. G statements;

1. Relevant photographs, the 112 Report Processing List, and the E global service place;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a criminal investigation report (including the situation at the time of arrest and the inspection and injury of the suspect inside of the suspect);

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Criminal Act is that the course and degree of assault against the police officer of this case are not somewhat weak.

Although the defendant had a record of punishment once by obstructing the performance of official duties, he/she is found to have a heavy crime.

However, the defendant seems to have an attitude against the crime, and the defendant was punished for interfering with the performance of official duties before the case.