beta
Text
Defendant
B and C shall be punished by imprisonment for five years, and by imprisonment for two years and six months, respectively.
However, as to Defendant A, the same shall apply.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
Defendant
B is the owner of “I” golf practice hall in Gwangju City H, Defendant C is the wife of Defendant B, and Defendant C is the co-born of Defendant C.
1. On June 2017, Defendant B and Defendant B requested to lend money to the father of the victim K (11) of the victim K (11 years old) who had come home with his/her father in order to prevent the golf course from going beyond auction because they were unable to repay the investment money received as security by providing “I” golf practice center as collateral. Defendant B and Defendant B recommended the shares of a specific company by recommending that L did not lend money and did not change the value of stocks. However, on June 2017, the Defendants purchased shares on the recommendation of Haman L and purchased shares at the company’s own price, but did not suffer losses until the principal amount of investment. Meanwhile, L was subject to a request for a detention warrant on October 16, 2017 and issued a detention warrant on October 18, 2017.
A, from October 24, 2017 to October 31, 2017, the Defendants agreed to purchase air tickets on September 17, 2017 with a plan to leave the Republic of Korea overseas travel from October 24, 2017 to October 31, 2017, and Defendant C agreed to send them to the Victim M during the period of October 2017.
“The victim K also agreed to the above trip pursuant to A, and accordingly, A made an additional reservation and purchase of the victim K’s airline tickets on October 17, 2017.
L, which recommended investment investment in stocks, is subject to the prosecution investigation due to the fraud of investment funds, and the victim K is different from his parents, and the defendant's child is defective according to the above overseas travel of the defendant's children, and the defendants are bound to have a concern about the safety of the victim K, which is under the control of the defendants and A, due to recommendation of L's stocks against the victim M by using the victim M's wife.