A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Punishment of the crime

1. On April 19, 2020, the Defendant: (a) around 05:38, the Gangseo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Burdo, opened the entrance door of the guest room; (b) discovered that the entrance door of the guest room was not opened, opened the above door and intruded into the door; and (c) then cut off 450,000 won in cash from the part of the victim’s wall located on the cremation, which was located on the cremation, using the gap in which the victim D, who is a guest, was locked.

2. Intrusion into a structure;

A. At around 06:00 on the same day, the Defendant: (a) stolen the property from “Gel” operated by the Victim F in Gangseo-gu Seoul, Gangseo-gu, Seoul; (b) opened the Moel door with the intent of stealinging it; (c) opened the Moel; (d) loaded the first floor of the stairs; and (e) listened to the body of the victim from the second floor of the Madern, and escaped.

Accordingly, the defendant invadeds on the building managed by the victim.

B. At around 06:11 on the same day, the Defendant: (a) stolen the property from “Jel” managed by the victim I in Yangcheon-gu Seoul, Yangcheon-gu, Seoul; (b) opened and intrudeed the above her entrance, and (c) escaped from the calculation unit by deeming that there was an employee.

Accordingly, the defendant invadeds on the building managed by the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each statement in D, F, and I;

1. Records of seizure and the list of seizure;

1. A photograph of each CCTV image to be cut and seized;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to report on investigation (to attach additional crimes committed by a suspect to sunrise and sunset time);

1. Relevant Article 330 of the Criminal Act and Article 319 (1) of the Criminal Act (the occupation of intrusion upon a building and the choice of imprisonment with prison labor) concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. From among concurrent offenders, the fact that the defendant had been punished more than 12 times for the same offense, even though he/she had served as the reason for sentencing under the former part of Article 37, Article 38(1)2, and Article 50 of the Criminal Act, he/she again commits the instant crime.