logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 2017.08.11 2016가단19369
손해배상(의)
Text

1. The Defendants jointly and severally agreed with the Plaintiff KRW 25,515,276 and 5% per annum from October 19, 2015 to August 11, 2017.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. On October 7, 2015, the Plaintiff entered a hospital operated by Defendant B to undergo a diagnosis of stoves, stoves, and ostoves, as a result of the Plaintiff’s visit to the hospital operated by Defendant B on October 8, 2015.

B. On October 17, 2015, the Plaintiff hospitalized into “D Hospital” on October 17, 2015, and received an invertebrication and felcation in the state of vertebrate anesthesia (Partial anesthesia) from Defendant C’s house, on October 19, 2015. Although, after spine anesthesia, the Plaintiff complained of serious pains on the bones and left side before spine anesthesia, the Plaintiff performed an operation without taking any particular measure.

C. Even after the operation, the Plaintiff complained of depreciation and satisfication as the pain continued.

On November 4, 2015, Defendant C, along with his opinion on the Plaintiff’s decline in his sense and low scopic symptoms, was presumed to be abnormal by the pressure from Malina SPLINT (C) by pressure on the brupt test, and most of the time (six months) passed by the brupted test, and continued to observe the process. D.

According to the results of the physical examination of the head of the Suwon University Hospital, the Plaintiff did not have any spathic disease related to the bruptal damage before the surgery, but the Plaintiff left the left-hand side due to the brug damage not caused by the brugal damage in the process of the surgery on November 14, 2016.

[Reasons for Recognition] Gap 2, 3, 4, 5, Eul 1, 2, 3, and 4; the result of the court's physical examination of the Head of the original Mine University Hospital; the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The following facts acknowledged based on each of the aforementioned facts admitted as liability for damages, namely, indirect facts proving that, in the event of symptoms causing a serious result to a patient after an operation or surgery, it is difficult to deem the occurrence of symptoms to have any other cause than medical malpractice.

arrow