A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for two years.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On October 12, 2016, the Defendant issued a summary order of KRW 4 million at the Suwon District Court for a violation of the Road Traffic Act.

On July 30, 2020, around C 16:42, the Defendant was demanded to respond to the measurement of drinking alcohol by inserting it into a drinking measuring instrument three times from 16:51 to 17:05, on July 30, 202, for the following reasons: (a) there was considerable reason to suspect that the Defendant was under the influence of alcohol, such as the Defendant’s face from the police officers E, and three other persons belonging to the C Hadong Police Station called up after receiving 112 a report that the driver of the D Maz car will drive under the influence of alcohol; and (b) he was demanded to comply with the measurement of drinking by inserting it into a drinking measuring instrument for three times from 16:5

그럼에도 피고인은 음주측정기에 입김을 불어넣는 시늉만 하는 방법으로 이를 회피하여 정당한 사유 없이 경찰공무원의 음주측정요구에 응하지 아니하였다.

Summary of Evidence

Colorics of internal reports, time when the suspect refuses to take a drunk test;

1. Visual images and CDs of suspect who refuses to take a drinking;

1. Report on the circumstantial statement of a drinking driver, investigation report (report on the circumstances of a drinking driver), investigation report (whether or not a suspect is found guilty or not), photograph of a drinking-free measuring instrument, and notification of completion of correction;

1. 판시 전력 : 범죄경력등조회회보서, 약식명령 [피고인 및 변호인은, 피고인이 음주운전을 하지 않았고 경찰관의 음주측정요구에 제대로 응하였다는 취지로 주장한다. 그러나 위 각 증거에 의하면, 피고인이 판시와 같이 술을 마시고 운전하였고 피고인이 2020. 9. 8. 직접 작성하여 이 법원에 제출한 서면에도 막걸리 2~3잔 정도 마시고 차를 몰고 집에 왔다는 취지로 기재되어 있다. 음주측정기에 입김을 불어넣는 시늉만 하여 경찰공무원의 음주측정요구에 응하지 않은 사실을 인정할 수 있으므로, 위 주장은 받아들일 수 없다] 법령의 적용

1. Criminal facts;