The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The main point of the grounds for appeal is that the lower court’s punishment (fine 8,500,000) is too unreasonable.

2. The judgment is against the defendant's recognition of the crime of this case, the fact that the defendant has no record of punishment for the same kind of crime, etc. However, the crime of this case was conducted without permission from the competent authority for the crime of this case from 2nd and 3nd to 4th to 1st generation in the case of 2nd and 3rd, and the 4th to 2nd generation in the case of 1st to 1st to 2nd generation in the case of 4th, and the quality of the crime is not less severe in light of the scale. It seems that the state of illegality of the building of this case is not resolved up until now, the court below imposed punishment by significantly reducing the fine amount as provided in the summary order, and other factors such as the defendant's age, character and character, environment, motive and circumstance leading to the crime of this case, circumstances before and after the crime of this case, etc., the defendant's assertion cannot be accepted.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.