beta
Text
1. The plaintiffs' appeals and the claims extended by plaintiffs A, E, F, G, H, and I in this Court are all dismissed.
2...
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. Party relations 1) Mate Housing in Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Nowon-gu (hereinafter “instant tenement housing”).
2) Plaintiff A owned 101 Dong Dong-dong B, 16 households in total. 2) Plaintiff B owned 201 Dong-dong B, Plaintiff B-dong B, Plaintiff E-dong B, Plaintiff F-dong C-dong 101, Plaintiff C-dong 201, Plaintiff H-dong 102, Plaintiff C-dong 102, Plaintiff B-dong 202, Defendant J-dong 104, Defendant C-dong 202.
3) Defendant J and Defendant K are married couple. B. (1) Each owner of the instant apartment house, including the Plaintiffs, agreed to sell all 16 households of the instant apartment house in a lump sum at around 2014, and each owner of the instant apartment house, including the Plaintiffs, signed a power of delegation (hereinafter “each power of delegation”) with the content that, around February 2014, each of the owners of the instant apartment house, entered the expected sale price for the households owned by each of the instant apartment houses, and delegated each power of delegation to Defendant J (hereinafter “each power of delegation”).
After that, from November 2014 to December 2014, some owners of the instant tenements of this case once again set up a power of attorney to Defendant J.
2) Around January 2015, Defendant K and Nonparty N, the wife of Defendant J, set the sales price of the entire 16 households of the instant tenement as KRW 5.07 billion and concluded a subsequent sales contract. 3) January 29, 2015 and the same year.
1. Around 30.30. A sales contract (hereinafter “each sales contract of this case”) was formulated for each household with respect to the Plaintiffs, Defendant J, and each household owned L, among the instant tenement houses.
[The sales contract of this case is written by O and P as a joint purchaser, but O is a N's spouse, P is a N's child, and the actual purchaser is N's child). The sales price stated in each of the sales contracts of this case is KRW 295 billion in the case of Plaintiff A, E, F, G, and H, KRW 30 million in the case of Plaintiff B, and KRW 30 million in the case of Plaintiff B, and KRW 290 million in the case of Plaintiff I, and KRW 30 million in the case of Plaintiff C, and KRW 290 million in the case of Plaintiff C.