logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2016.07.14 2016가단206812
손해배상 청구
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. Pampaf&D Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Pampaf&D”) is an executor who sells 16th shop among the buildings in Eunpyeong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government B (hereinafter “instant commercial building”).

B. 1) Pampf&D shall recruit the buyers of the instant commercial building, register the sales of the instant commercial building by dividing it, and re-let it from the buyers, and operate the “C Stackf&D Co., Ltd.” (hereinafter the “Camp”) at the same time, and pay the buyer the final profit of the high rate for 10 years.

Around February 21, 2011, the commercial building in this case was inserted into 300 stores, and the commercial building in this case was partitioned into 12 stores and sold in lots. (2) A PPPD combines the commercial building in this case, which was divided into 12 units to 1,494 square meters, into 240 sections for exclusive use. On March 8, 2011, the commercial building in this case, which was combined into 240 sections for exclusive use, was divided into 26 sections for exclusive use. On March 22, 2011, the three of the commercial building in this case, which was divided into 26 sections for exclusive use, was divided into 26 sections for exclusive use, and the commercial building in this case was divided into 315 sections for exclusive use.

In addition, on May 14, 201, the Pamp ApWD filed an application for the separate registration of the instant commercial building with the Seoul Western District Court's Bupyeong registry office on May 14, 201, and the instant commercial building was registered as a sectional registration number No. 27163 on May 18, 201.

C. On August 15, 2010, the Plaintiff sold No. 16-50 (hereinafter “instant real estate”) to KRW 92,974,000 among the instant commercial buildings, and paid the price in full, and completed the registration of ownership transfer on November 11, 201.

However, the real estate of this case is divided ownership according to structural division.

arrow