A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

Punishment of the crime

On May 11, 2015, the Defendant was sentenced to four months for obstruction of the performance of official duties, damage to property, and non-compliance with the withdrawal from the Gwangju District Court, and completed the execution of the sentence on June 25, 2015.

At around 12:30 on July 10, 2015, the Defendant was under the influence of alcohol at the square of a wooden station located in Sinpo City, Sinsan-ro 98, and received a report that he was under the influence of alcohol and was under the influence of alcohol, and was under the control of the Defendant, the Defendant was under the control of the disturbance from D, such as 119 first aid workers who called out to the 119th emergency medical service workers with a large voice, and booming drinking, and the Defendant was under the control of the Defendant.

Accordingly, the Defendant: (a) took a bucker’s hump hump hump hump; (b) took a bucker’s hump hump hump hump hump hump hump hump; (c) humbucks hump hump hump hump, humbbbbbbuck, hump hump hump

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning patrol and maintenance of order of police officers.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. The tear tear cover photograph;

1. Previous records: Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to inquiry reports, such as criminal records, investigation reports (Attachment to a copy of the previous criminal judgment), and personal identification and confinement status;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes and Article 136 of the Election of Imprisonment;

1. The reason for sentencing Article 35 of the Criminal Act among repeated offenders;

1. Determination of types of crimes: Type 1 of obstruction of performance of official duties;

2. Determination of the scope of sentence: Aggravation, one year to four years (a person who is an offender among special families: Cumulative crime of the same kind);

3. In light of the fact that the defendant who made a decision on the sentence for obstruction of performance of official duties has again committed an offense of obstruction of official duties during the period of repeated crime, etc. because the sentence has been terminated and it has not been long (the day immediately after the end of the period of detention in the workhouse concerning a fine executed after the completion of the sentence) and

However, the defendant's mistake.