A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for up to six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

At around 01:20 on August 13, 2015, the Defendant: (a) took a bath on the ground that he was under the influence of alcohol on the street “Cju’s store” located in C, and (b) was able to have the Defendant come home; (c) the Defendant took a bath on the ground that he was able to have the Defendant come home; (d) “I am out, I am scam, and scam, I am scam, and am off, and walked, and walked and walked the patrol car; and (e) the police officer took the fambling of his son’s bridge with his hand, and scambling him, and scambling him, and scambling it with E, and scambling it with his character, and scambling it with his hand, thereby hindering the police officer’s legitimate performance of duties, and obstructing the police officer’s performance of duties.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement of E and F;

1. G statements;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on investigation reporting;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act selecting a penalty;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act ( considered favorable circumstances among the reasons for sentencing following the suspended sentence);

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act of the community service order;

1. The scope of the recommended sentence according to the sentencing guidelines - the basic area of the obstruction of performance of official duties (from June to April), the basic area of the obstruction of performance of official duties (from June to April): the decision of the second sentence that there is no special person: The crime of this case against a police officer who performs official duties is not less vulnerable to the nature of the crime - The fact that the crime of this case is the first sentence, the fact that the defendant is against the first sentence, the fact that the defendant is against the first sentence, and all the sentencing conditions specified in the arguments and records of this case, including the above sentencing conditions and the defendant's age, character and behavior, environment, and motive for the crime.