The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

The punishment sentenced by the court below in summary of the grounds for appeal (ten months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

Judgment

The attitude of recognizing and opposing the crime of this case seems to be.

The victim J of the crime of interference with business and the original trial do not want the punishment of the above victim.

However, the Defendant again committed the crime of interference with business even though he was punished as a fine by the crime of interference with business during the suspension period of imprisonment with labor, and again committed the crime of this case.

In addition to the above suspended sentence of imprisonment, the criminal records prior to the suspended sentence of imprisonment or the criminal records prior to the suspended sentence of imprisonment due to obstruction of performance of official duties, obstruction of business, insult, violence, etc.

In addition, considering all of the sentencing conditions, such as the defendant's age, character, conduct and environment, the sentence imposed by the court below cannot be deemed to be too unreasonable.

Defendant’s assertion is without merit.

The defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act because it has no reason to appeal.