The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (e.g., imprisonment with prison labor for six months) of the lower court is too unreasonable.

2. There are extenuating circumstances such as the Defendant’s act of crime in this case under the influence of alcohol, and the fact that the investigative agency, the lower court, and the court of the trial, alternatively, have shown the attitude that the Defendant had committed the crime in question, and had shown the attitude that the Defendant committed the crime.

However, in light of the fact that the Defendant had been punished more than 10 times as the crime of interference with business, and in particular, even in 2012, the Defendant again committed the instant crime without being aware of the punishment despite being sentenced to a fine as the crime of interference with business, and the insult of the police officer, there is no change of circumstances that may vary between the lower court and the punishment, and other circumstances shown in the records and arguments, such as the Defendant’s age, character, character and environment, occupation, power, history, means and consequence of the instant crime, etc., the sentence of the lower court is too unreasonable.

3. Accordingly, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.