1. Revocation of a judgment of the first instance;

2. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

3. All costs of the lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. The grounds for this part of the disposition by the court are the same as the reasons for the judgment of the court of first instance, and thus, the grounds for this part are cited in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. Whether the disposition is lawful;

A. The purport of the Plaintiff’s assertion is to revoke the instant disposition on the following grounds.

1) The term “Korea Infrastructure Safety Corporation” refers to the Korea Infrastructure Safety Corporation without the grounds for disposition. The construction engineers of all departments provide technical and operational support through organic collaboration among them. Accordingly, the Plaintiff actually performed the role of transferring and consulting technical duties based on the Plaintiff’s prior experience in the process of performing each of the instant projects alleged by the Defendant, and thereafter, reported this fact with the confirmation of the business management department belonging to the instant Corporation. Therefore, the instant disposition does not have any ground for disposition. 2) If the Plaintiff did not have any awareness that he would have falsely reported his career at the time of the instant report, the number of cases was only three cases, and the degree of breach of duty is minor, and the Plaintiff would have been subject to the Plaintiff’s duty to participate in the instant preliminary examination due to excessive deviation from the Plaintiff’s capacity to participate in the instant project, etc. (hereinafter referred to as “the Plaintiff’s duty to participate in the instant preliminary examination”).

(b) The details of the relevant statutes are as shown in the attached statutes.