1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

1. The reasons for this part of the disposition are as follows: (a) the court’s reasoning for this part is as follows: (b) the “instant project” under Section 2 of the judgment of the court of first instance, which is identical to the corresponding part of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the entry into “the career of the instant case”; and (c) thus, (d) the same shall be cited in accordance with Article

2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful

A. The Plaintiff’s assertion 1) In the instant work experience Nos. 1 and 3 as stated below, the instant disposition based on a different premise is unlawful since the Plaintiff did not have any grounds for the disposition, even though it made a false report on the content of the work by mistake and did not falsely report the work experience. In other words, in the instant work experience, the Plaintiff was in charge of the management and supervision of the “K Corporation” as the head of the FF from February 28, 2006 to March 28, 2007, and the instant disposition was not involved in the instant work from April 5, 2007 to December 31, 2007, but the G head of the GG department did not engage in the management and supervision of the “DU Accident Point Improvement Corporation” as a manager of the instant work, and thus, it cannot be deemed that the said work experience was false, and in the instant work experience of 3rd work experience, the Plaintiff was issued as a deviation from H on Apr. 12, 2010 to 201.

(b) is as stated in relevant laws and regulations (attached Form).

C. 1) On the assertion that there is no ground for disposition, Article 21(1) of the Construction Technology Promotion Act provides that “The absence of grounds for disposition” shall be determined.