Text
1. On October 13, 2014, the Defendant’s youth internships up to the time he/she returned the amount of 142,574,010 won received against the Plaintiff.
Reasons
Facts and circumstances of recognition and disposition
A. The Plaintiff is a legal entity that is engaged in the business, such as building dogs, architectural production, and budget consulting for construction costs.
Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “probank”) is a small and medium enterprise operating institution entrusted by the Minister of Employment and Labor with affairs concerning youth internship projects (hereinafter referred to as “instant projects”) pursuant to relevant statutes, such as Articles 25 and 34 of the Framework Act on Employment Policy, Article 25(1) of the Employment Insurance Act, Articles 35 and 36 of the Enforcement Decree of the same Act, and Article 7 of the Special Act on the Promotion of Youth Employment, etc.
B. Since September 2009, the Plaintiff entered into the instant agreement with the professional bank (hereinafter “instant agreement”), the Plaintiff participated as the instant business entity and employed 37 internships by April 2013.
B. (i) The Defendant’s measure following the unfair receipt of subsidies (i.e., the instant business plan and the internship employed by the Plaintiff pursuant to the instant agreement were provided by professional banks with youth internship subsidies and subsidies for full-time conversion from the Defendant.
She, however, the defendant conducted a fact-finding survey on the plaintiff around July 2013, and found that the plaintiff received youth internship support and regular conversion support from the professional bank and the defendant by making up for the wages actually paid to 30 internships.
Accordingly, the Defendant ordered the return of KRW 142,574,010 in total of KRW 9,074,010 and the regular conversion subsidy of KRW 43,50,000 received from the Plaintiff based on Articles 30 and 31 of the Subsidy Management Act and the instant agreement, and issued a disposition prohibiting the new employment of an intern for the next two years.
The order of return of the youth internship subsidy does not exceed the above, the order of return of the subsidy for full-time conversion shall be deemed as the order of return, the order of return of the subsidy for full-time conversion, and the disposition prohibiting the employment of the internship shall be deemed as the three dispositions, and all of them shall be prior to each other.