The defendant is not guilty. The summary of the judgment against the defendant shall be published.

The application for compensation of this case is dismissed.

1. The Defendant, from around September 2013 to June 25, 2014, leased and used a factory of 1070.76 square meters of the victim E in Yangsan City F and the 1070.76 square meters of the floor in G, the Defendant damaged one column of the sn beam beam pole (35cm in width x 17cm in length x 306cm in height x 306cm in height) of the sn beamline, which supported the two floors in the above G, by cutting off the sn beam pole column (35cm in width x 35cm in length x 17cm in height x 306cm in height) under the name of the Defendant’s rubber launch machine installed without the victim’s consent.

2. The evidence that corresponds to the facts charged in the instant case includes both E and H’s respective legal and police statements, and on-site photographs. However, in light of the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly admitted and investigated, it is difficult to believe each of E and H’s statements. The evidence submitted by the prosecutor alone proves that the facts charged in the instant case is beyond reasonable doubt.

It is difficult to see, and there is no other evidence to prove it.

A. The Defendant: (a) removed the sn beam beam pole of G from the police to the police during December 2011, 201, the snive beam pole of G (hereinafter “instant columns”); (b) however, while installing machinery at the instant factory, the Defendant was in a situation where it was difficult to install machinery unless the instant columns are removed; and (c) the machinery installation business operator I could remove the instant columns with the permission of the principal owner.

E is removed after the permission of E, so it does not constitute a crime.

The argument is asserted.

B. On October 25, 201, the Defendant entered into a lease agreement on the instant plant owned by E and the police station on October 25, 201, and, at the same time or following the day or following the date of the said contract, E allowed the Defendant to cut a plug pole (hereinafter “a plug pole”) located in F in Yangsan City, but stated that there was no permission to remove the instant pole.

(c)

E shall be as above.