1. The defendant (Counterclaim plaintiff)'s appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Defendant-Counterclaim Plaintiff.

purport, purport, and.

1. The reasons for the court's explanation concerning this case are as follows: each "the result of appraisal by appraiser H" in the 5th, 7th, and 12th, 17th, 12th and 17th, 'the result of appraisal by the appraiser H' in the 17th, 'the statement of evidence No. 10, 11th,' 'A evidence No. 10, 8th and J' in the 15th, 'the witness I and J' in the 9th, 'I and J' in the 17th, 'A 17th, 'Y' in the 10th and 10th, 'I and J' in the 10th, 12th and 19th, 'the 10th, 00, 000 won' in the 13th, 'the 10th,000 won' in the 10th, 200th, 2000.

In light of the whole purport of the pleadings, the inseminator's inseminator's inseminator's inseminator's Appellant's Appellant's 1, Eul's 2, Eul's 1, Eul's 4-1 and Eul's 22 through 32 (each video and witness's testimony, including each number, and the whole purport of the pleadings, the inseminator's inseminator Construction Co., Ltd., which is a subcontractor of the construction company of the construction company of the construction company of the construction company of the construction company of the construction company of the construction company of the construction company of the construction company of the construction company of the construction company of this case, the inseminator's sloping beamline, etc. was leased from E engaged in rental business such as Ekn beam for the construction of the underground earth of the construction company of this case, and the creditor E is the debtor on June 4, 2009, which was constructed by the defendant as to the construction company of the construction company of the construction company of the construction company of the construction company of this case and sent the plaintiff's 18.