A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On November 21, 2014, at around 00:45, the Defendant: (a) committed assault on the part of the main disturbance at the D convenience store located in Dongjak-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government C, and obstructed the performance of duties by the police officers in relation to the handling of 112 reporting duties, arrest of the Defendant as a flagrant offender, and arrest of the Defendant as a flagrant offender, and arrest of the police officers in relation to the arrest of the flagrant offender, and arrest of the police officers in charge of the crime.” On November 21, 2014, the Defendant: (b) 0:45, the Defendant took the main disturbance at the D convenience store located in Dongjak-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government; (c) 112 reporting duties; (d) 112 reporting duties; and (e) 2000 legitimate performance of duties by the police officers in relation to arrest of flagrant offenders and suppression of crimes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on police statements made to G and H

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor as a matter of choice (including the details of the punishment for a crime and multiple violence crimes, etc.);

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Reasons for the sentencing of Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Criminal Act [Determination of the scope of the obstruction of performance of official duties] The basic area of the obstruction of performance of official duties (decision of the recommended area]: From June to April of the year [decision of the sentence] 6 months to June of the year (decision of the sentence of the punishment of the punishment of the crime, the fact that there is no punishment exceeding the fine, the fact that there is no punishment exceeding the fine, the fact that there is no deposit of one million won, the fact that there is an attitude against each other, such as deposit of one million won, etc.] - There is no major reason for the sentencing [Determination of the suspension of execution] - there is no reason for the recommendation of the sentencing guidelines: Determination of the suspension of execution by comprehensively comparing and evaluating the reasons for the sentencing; Determination of the suspension of execution - Determination of the suspension of execution by comprehensively

1. The summary of the facts charged is around 00:30 on November 21, 2014, the Defendant entered the convenience store located in Dongjak-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government as a customer, and entered the said convenience store.