Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Criminal facts

On April 7, 2014, around 03:55, the Defendant received 112 reports from the head of the Dong-gu, Ansan-si, the Defendant sent the victim’s chest by hand on the ground that he parked the patrol car in front of the above Chinese restaurant operated by the Defendant, on the ground that, at the front of the Dong-gu, Ansan-si, the public official of the police police box affiliated with the Police Police Station of the Doansan Police Station, who called the “Sasan-si, the senior citizens fright to wear a spaw at the Chinese restaurant located in the Dong-gu, Seosan-si.”

After having dealt with the case received by E, the Defendant continued to interfere with the progress of the patrol vehicle by blocking the front of the patrol vehicle and blocking the patrol vehicle in order to return to the patrol box.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of public duties for the maintenance of public order by police officers.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to E by the police;

1. A written statement prepared by the F;

1. Application of the statutes governing the editing of images, such as photographing victims;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of fines, and the choice of fines;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The crime of this case on the ground of sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is a case where the defendant, while under the influence of alcohol, takes a bath against the police public official and interferes with his duties. In light of the unfavorable circumstances, such as the defendant's taking-in, the defendant's taking-in, despite recognizing the crime of this case against the police official, reflects his mistake in depth, and the degree of damage suffered by the pertinent police official is not severe, and the defendant's taking into account favorable circumstances such as the initial offender, and all of the sentencing conditions shown in the trial of this case is determined as ordered.