A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date of the final judgment.

Punishment of the crime

On December 13, 2019, at around 20:55, the Defendant reported 112 that “A male-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-at-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-child-

The Defendant, who tried to separate the Defendant and C from the Defendant, led the Defendant to wear C’s arms by hand, and assaulted the Defendant at one time by drinking the Defendant a horse.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers on public peace and maintenance of order related to the handling of 112 reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement of E and C;

1. On-site and photographs of damaged parts;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (F telephone conversations for reference);

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of criminal punishment, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The punishment as ordered shall be determined by taking into account the circumstances that are disadvantageous to the accused having many criminal records of violence with the reason of sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Act, or the fact that the degree of assault of this case seems not to be serious;