logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2018.05.24 2017고단3892
사기등
Text

1. The defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for six months;

2.Provided, That the above sentence shall be executed for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On May 9, 2017, around 02:30 on May 9, 2017, the Defendant ordered the Defendant to move in a D taxi operated by the victim C in front of the station in the south-gu, Seoul Do road and pay the taxi fee properly.

However, at the time, the defendant did not have a cash or credit card or other means of payment, and even if the victim gets a taxi driving or arrives at the destination, he did not have any intention or ability to pay the taxi fee properly.

The Defendant, by deceiving the victim, caused the victim to operate the said taxi up to 20 roads, Guro-gu Seoul, Guro-gu, Seoul, by allowing the victim to drive the taxi up to the front road of the 20-ro, Guro-gu, Seoul, thereby acquiring the pecuniary benefits equivalent to 6,800 won of the taxi fee.

2. On May 9, 2017, at around 02:30 on May 9, 2017, the Defendant: (a) was boarding a D taxi operated by the victim C ( South and 49 years old) in front of the station in the south-gu Seoul Do road; and (b) was able to see the Defendant’s “eachway, Chewing, and dead” to the victim;

C. The spit, spit, etc. spit on the taxi, and the cab on May 9, 2017, when the 20-way 20-ro, Guro-gu, Seoul, arrives in front of the 20-way Gyeong-gu, Seoul, the Defendant did not pay the cab to the victim as specified in paragraph 1. When the victim moved to the 2 public security center in the Gu-ro police station error in the neighboring area by driving the cab for the police report, the Defendant escaped from the cab, and the victim interfered with the victim's cab business by force by force, such as the 10-minute flabing the flab on the flab on the flab on the flab on the flab on the fla.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. C’s statement;

1. Application of the receipt statute

1. Relevant Article 347(1) of the Criminal Act and Article 347(1) of theo Criminal Act (Fraud, Selection of Imprisonment, and Selection of Punishment) concerning criminal facts (Interference with business affairs and choice of imprisonment);

1. Aggravation concurrent crimes;

arrow