logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 군산지원 2018.08.27 2017고단10
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[2017 Highest 10] The Defendant operated a company with limited liability for agricultural and livestock food processing business in Yasan-si B.

On October 2015, the Defendant made a false statement to the victim F by telephone from the company of “G” to receive from “G” to “G” through “G” on a daily basis, the Defendant sent KRW 100 million deposit to “G” to the victim H, thereby supplying the victim’s 70 boxes each day.”

However, in fact, the Defendant did not have concluded a definite contract from G 'G to supply 70 gamblings or 120 gamblings, and even if the Defendant received KRW 100 million from the damaged party as a security deposit due to the difficulties in corporate circumstances, such as failure to provide monthly salary for employees at the time, he/she did not have the intent or ability to supply 70 gamblings every day to the injured party, and was thought to have used the transferred security money as debt repayment, company operation expenses, etc.

Ultimately, on October 6, 2015, the Defendant: (a) on October 6, 2015, 30 million won at the I Bank Account under the name of the Defendant; and (b) the same month.

7. received a total of KRW 100,000 from the same account, such as receiving KRW 70,000.

Accordingly, the defendant was given property by deceiving the victim.

[2017 Highest 469] The Defendant, while running a limited company C at Hasan-si, was aware of the difficulty in running the limited company C through a group of friendships with the difficulty of running the business, extended the period of repayment without repaying the amount of KRW 100 million on June 2013 to the victim L, who was aware of the business. Meanwhile, the Defendant was willing to pay the amount of goods borrowed from the victim with additional money and pay other debts.

On September 2014, the Defendant secured the amount of KRW 100 million to the victim who demanded the repayment of the above KRW 100 million in the office of the above limited company C, which was the victim to receive the payment of KRW 100 million. However, it is insufficient to include KRW 500 million as deposit money in order to receive the chill from E with monopoly.

The above KRW 100 million.

arrow