logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 2016.01.27 2015고단1645
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant 1 is the actual operator of “D” company in Kim Jong-si, which is in Kim Jong-si, and KRW 180 million, which was loaned to purchase the office site of limited company D, and KRW 180 million, KRW 180 million, KRW 100 million, KRW 320 million, and KRW 300 million, and KRW 30 million, and KRW 30 million, and KRW 30 million, as interest and personnel expenses on the above debt were incurred at least KRW 30 million, it was serious financial difficulties.

1. On July 10, 2009, the Defendant against the victim E is not money in the “G office operated by the victim E in Kim Jong-si on July 10, 2009.” The Defendant borrowed KRW 100 million to the victim. The Defendant borrowed money to receive bank loans three months after lending money.

“Falsely speaking,” and receiving KRW 100,000 from the injured party.

However, since the defendant was under a low credit rating due to a large amount of debt at the time, even if he borrowed KRW 100 million from the injured party, he/she did not have an intention or ability to receive a bank loan after three months.

2. On January 26, 2010, the Defendant against the victim H ought to take the phone to the victim H to secure the scrap metal volume.

The delivery of scrap metal shall pay the price immediately on the face of the week.

In addition, from January 27, 2010 to February 25, 2010, it received from the injured party a delivery of the amount equivalent to 4,380 km equivalent to 1,686,30 km of the market price of KRW 1,380 from the damaged party and received a delivery of scrap metal of the amount of KRW 14,312,250 at the market price every eight times from around that time to February 25, 2010 as indicated in the annexed List of Crimes (1).

However, the defendant did not have the intention or ability to pay the price immediately even if he has received the scrap metal from the injured party.

3. On February 14, 201, the Defendant against the victim I was guilty.

arrow