logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2017.11.30 2017고단2407
배임수재
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for two years.

490,000,000 won shall be additionally collected from the defendant.

As to the defendant.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant works as the leader of the infrastructure team in the case of E-the-job partnership, and is in general in charge of the affairs related to the "F New Construction Project" in progress by the above company from design to execution.

On the beginning of 2013, the Defendant selected a design and supervision service company for the “F New Construction Project” as above, and the service company should be selected through fair procedures, and the contract amount should be determined in consideration of the interests and losses of the E-B Bank.

On February 2, 2013, the Defendant would make up a satisfactory design plan by participating in the G-F New Construction Design Competition with H of the first division of the G-F-type design project in the G-F-type design in the G-type design in the G-type design, and when he receives a design from the G-type dispute resolution committee, he would pay the Defendant the amount of 2-300 million won as the rebates.

“The” accepted a solicitation.

After that, the Defendant participated in the phenomenon design bid to select the above F New Construction Project design and supervision service company, and the Defendant directly participated in the process of examining the selection of the above company around February 28, 2013, and gave a higher score corresponding to 1st to the G Construction Bank, and as a result, on March 7, 2013, the G Construction Bank was selected as a priority negotiation subject to the above F New Construction Project design and supervision service.

Around March 10, 2013, the Defendant accepted a request from the GBB office located in Songpa-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, “Around March 10, 2013, the Defendant would pay a large amount of rebates to the Defendant. In concluding a fixed contract, the Defendant did not reduce the bid amount or would make a contract by minimizing the reduction.” On March 21, 2013, the Defendant entered into a contract with the GBA for “F new construction project design and supervision services” with the amount of the service contract amounting to KRW 2,502,50,000.

After that, the defendant increased the amount of the above contract according to the design change due to the increase in the construction area, and the trade name in Songpa-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government on November 2015.

arrow