logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2019.09.25 2018가합567728
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The parties 1) The Plaintiff is a factory A or E-Dong (hereinafter “instant factory”) located in Mapo-si.

(ii) E is an individual entrepreneur who owns D and engages in the business of manufacturing, processing, and supplying the subjects of lectures with the trade name of F, and is a person who is in charge of the business of collecting the shot shot shot shot shot shot shot shot shot (hereinafter referred to as the “shot shot shot shot shot shot shot shot shot shots”), and G, Defendant H is an employee of F to take charge of the repair and shot shot shot shot shots.

3) Defendant Company was established on June 26, 2014 and engaged in the manufacture, installation, and sale of painting facilities and storage facilities, and the representative director of the Defendant Company is E running the said F, and inside director I is punished by E. B. The occurrence of the instant fire. (B) The Plaintiff used a divers installed by F from around 2012 in order to remove smells, such as divers and painting, used in the process of spraying and crushing timbering.

2) At around 14:00 on November 2, 2015, E means a gregrative machine installed at the Ddong where the Plaintiff carried out the painting work among the instant factories (the wall opposite to Ddong main entrance door was set up on the wall opposite to Ddong main entrance door, 2.2 price of the greged machine, which was set up on the left side when viewed at the entrance of the main entrance.

)의 프로펠러에 금이 생겨 소음과 진동이 발생하니 이를 수리하여 달라는 요구를 받고 H, G을 시켜 집진기 수리작업을 하도록 하였다. 3) H, G은 집진기 내부에서 수리작업의 일환으로 용접 작업을 하다가 용접기에서 튄 불티로 인하여 위 집진기 주변에서 화재가 발생하여 이 사건 공장 중 철골조 샌드위치패널 창고인 C, D동이 전소되고, 위 전소된 건물과 인접한 E동이 일부 소실, B동이 화열로 외벽이 일부 변형되었으며, 각 창고 내 보관...

arrow