Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment without prison labor for eight months.

However, from the date of the final judgment of this case, each of the above two years against the Defendants.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

B is a director of D, who is a facility company for the gymnasium gymnasium (hereinafter referred to as "gymnasium") and Defendant A is an employee of the said company, who has been engaged in gymnasium repair and contact.

Victims E installed and used a string machine in harmony with the air using the absorption of active coal in order to eliminate smells, e.g., e., fins used in the process of smoking and crushing timber in the above G, as a person who uses G from the trade name, who operates a company that produces, processes, and supplies the subject of lectures, and who operates a company that produces, processes, and supplies the subject of lectures.

On November 2, 2015, at around 14:00, the Defendants were installed on the wall side of the main entrance door to the factory building in which a dust-proof fire has occurred at the said G painting work factory. Of them, at the entrance of the main entrance, the Defendants were installed on the wall of the main entrance, referring to the dust-proof machine installed on the left side; hereinafter “the instant dust-proof machine”).

In light of the inside melting to repair, there was a duty of care to remove the dust or oil vapor, so that fire does not occur due to melting work in which the oil vaporr, which occurred in the factory, was installed by gred at a grout, and the process of using the grout, and to prevent the dust or oil from spreading water or blocking the surrounding area of the grout to the frout material, and to prevent it from being transferred to the frouter.

Nevertheless, the Defendants neglected to do so, and Defendant A did the contact work, and Defendant B had the contact work without giving any particular attention to Defendant A.

Ultimately, the Defendants jointly moved the fire that occurred during the contact with the above occupational negligence to a dust in the vicinity, and continued to spread the above factory to the inside of the factory (hereinafter “instant plant”).