logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 2016.12.14 2015가합5148
건물철거 통지 등 청구의 소
Text

1. The plaintiff's claims against the defendants are all dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The Plaintiff is a company established to carry on the business of manufacturing and selling high pressure containers, and the head of complete Gun is a management agency that manages the management of the main science and industry complex (hereinafter “instant industrial complex”) under the Industrial Cluster Development and Factory Establishment Act (hereinafter “Industrial Cluster Act”).

B. On April 1, 2009, the Plaintiff entered into a contract with the Governor of Jeollabuk-do to occupy the factory site of 3,047.4m2 (hereinafter “instant industrial site”) at the location of the factory (hereinafter “instant occupancy contract”).

C. On December 209, the Plaintiff entered into a land lease agreement (hereinafter “instant land lease agreement”) with the Defendant Korea Land and Housing Corporation (hereinafter “Defendant Corporation”) which is the owner of the instant industrial site pursuant to the instant occupancy agreement, and newly constructed three-story factories of general steel structure, sand site location panel, etc. on the ground (a 5,041.6m2, 262.19m2, 340m2, 340.15m2, hereinafter “instant factory”), and completed factory registration on February 8, 2010.

On April 14, 2015, the Plaintiff renewed the instant site lease agreement with Defendant Corporation as shown in attached Table 1.

E. Defendant SK Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant Company”) completed the registration of ownership transfer for the instant factory on October 8, 2015, based on the sale by voluntary auction.

After that, on October 13, 2015, the head of the relevant Special Metropolitan City Gun terminated the instant occupancy contract based on Article 42 of the Industrial Cluster Act (hereinafter “instant termination disposition”) on the ground that the Plaintiff was successful in auction (hereinafter “instant cancellation disposition”), and issued a disposition revoking the registration of the instant factory based on Article 17 of the same Act (hereinafter “instant cancellation disposition”).

F. Defendant Corporation’s instant disposition on October 14, 2015 on the ground that the said disposition was rendered to the Plaintiff.

arrow