logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울행정법원 2016.02.19 2015구합62378
제재처분 취소청구의 소
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Details of the disposition;

A. From March 2, 2011, the Plaintiff served as the representative director of a stock company B (hereinafter “B”) and retired on July 18, 2013.

(b) B means a system that, on the basis of the first accident transaction in C (C; hereinafter referred to as “C”) in 2008, makes an analysis model in accordance with statistical techniques using large amounts of card use information and relevant customer information, calculates the possible degree of the occurrence of an accident at the time of the occurrence of card sales, and predicts and prevents accident transactions in advance.

Since the introduction of Eul, the need for the Round arises, and entered into a purchase contract with D (hereinafter referred to as "D") on January 30, 2013 for C's Round. The human resources for D, including D, who are the general managers of the said C Round project, put into B and started C development work from February 2013 to October 4, 2013. From February 2013 to March 2013, 2013, the C Round conducted work in G (hereinafter referred to as "G") located in Jongno-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government F (hereinafter referred to as "I Center") as it is necessary to consult and define B's claims management and duties. From March 3, 2013 to October 2013, the work was conducted in Gangseo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Center (hereinafter referred to as "I Center").

C. E, around February 2013 and around June 201 of the same year, in the course of performing C development work, connects his own USB domains to G and I Center computers for business purposes, stored customer information (name, resident registration number, cell phone number, card number, card number, maximum credit number, card use amount, etc.) in approximately 5,378 million from B customer stored in the computer for business purposes, and carried it out to J who had the intention to utilize the card customer information for loan brokerage, etc.

(hereinafter “instant information leakage accident”). D.

The Financial Supervisory Service conducted a sector inspection on B three times from January 13, 2014 to October 2, 2014, and hereinafter referred to as "the case."

arrow