Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 300,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant, around June 21, 201, connected to the Internet homepage (D) of the said church by using a computer installed therein at the meeting room in Yangju-si, Yangju-si, and inserted a letter in the bulletin board as the title “ from the king, as soon as possible from the king,” and then, in relation to the victim E, he/she is in the same way as the victim E.

(i) the Republic of Korea completely left the Republic of Korea due to the same person’s interest, but the Republic of Korea (China) was a king.

E이가 이단의 괴수야. 이단이야 (중략)약장수들을 봐봐.

How much the chief of the household can he deduct the money of the people in the speech, and how much the chief of the household want to get the money from Australia.

The same person as E must do l. B. H. H. H. T. H. T. H. T. H. H. T. H. T. H. T. H. T. H. H. T. H. H. T. L. T. L. H. T. H. T. H. H.

In addition, Egrgrgs E are so strong as to be paid each time hegrgrgrhs are snowd from one another, so it is necessary for the Gu between the two times to stop.

Mambals required by the Gu to cut off persons who are boomed by the Gu;

‘The recording file containing the contents of ‘' was published together.

Accordingly, the defendant openly insultingd the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement to E by the police;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a report on investigation;

1. Relevant Articles of the Criminal Act and the choice of punishment for the crime: Article 311 of the Criminal Act;

1. Detention in Labor House: The FM religious organizations on the grounds of the conviction of Article 70 and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act are recognized as the circumstances that the G religious organizations operated by E around 2008 adopt extreme faith and dignity of H; and the circumstances in which the Defendant carried the recording file in order to inform E church that E church is a different group.

However, the following circumstances revealed in the above evidence, i.e., ① the place where the Defendant written his writing is an open church website to anyone, ② the contents are more abstract evaluation of E and personal criticism than the specific doctrine, ③ the expressions coming from the sexual scam.