logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 고양지원 2013.08.21 2012고단1443
사기방조등
Text

Defendant

A and C shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for one year and six months.

, however, for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[2] Defendant A and B are the operators of the “F” mobile phone agency in Ansan-gu, the members of the Dong-gu, Ansan-si, and Defendant C is the operators of the “H” agency in Gu-si.

1. The Defendants in violation of the Telecommunications Business Act knew that the Defendants may use the pre-paid phone provided by the Defendants for crimes, such as licensing, loan fraud, etc., they sold a large amount of pre-paid phone to I to acquire profits therefrom.

Defendant

A and Defendant B, from January 4, 201 to May 26, 2012, provided I with 967 prepaidphones in the name of another person, including China, on condition that he/she will receive 20,000 won per unit as stated in the attached Form F openings among the particulars of the prepaidphones. Defendant B registered the business as F’s representative from December 29, 201 to May 26, 201, and provided I with part of the above prepaidphones 967 from around that time to May 26, 2012.

Accordingly, from January 4, 201 to December 28, 2011, Defendant A alone, and the Defendants conspired to provide telecommunications services provided by telecommunications business operators for another’s communications purpose.

B. On the condition that Defendant C received KRW 20,000 won per unit from August 1, 2011 to May 31, 2012, Defendant C provided I with 1,422 prepaid phones as indicated in the H’s opening details among the attached prepaid phones.

Accordingly, the defendant provided telecommunications services provided by telecommunications business operators for another's communications.

2. The Defendants provided the Defendants with the pre-paid in the name of China, etc., as described in paragraph (1), with full knowledge of the fact that the pre-phone provided by the Defendants may be used for licensing crimes, such as loan fraud, etc.

I would be provided with the pre-paid by the Defendants.

arrow