Defendants shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

In the event that the Defendants did not pay the above fine, the fine shall be respectively imposed.

Punishment of the crime

1. On December 13, 2012, LW of the basic facts was indicted with detention due to a violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Bribery), etc. on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Bribery) in the Gwangju District Court, and appealed KRW 50,000,000 as well as KRW 60,000,00 as a penalty, which was imposed on February 12, 2014. On October 22, 2015, the appellate court filed a final appeal with the sentence of KRW 50,000,000 as well as KRW 50,000 as well as KRW 35,00 as well as KRW 35,00 as well.

On June 18, 201, in the trial of the first instance of the instant case, regarding the facts charged that M received a bribe in the name of the expenses for training abroad at “O” restaurant located in the Jeonnam N, M, M was at issue at the above date and at the above time, there was a fact between M and the above restaurant. P et al. stated that M was drinking together with M at the above restaurant at the latest more than 18:0,00, which is the hours agreed at the time, and Defendant A and Defendant B stated that M had been in the above restaurant at the time. On the other hand, M et al. stated that M et al., along with Defendant A and Defendant B, moved clothes from the G New International Department of Commerce, which is a LA military official vehicle operated by Defendant C, to a public official in the above restaurant immediately L, and that he did not have been holding the clothes at the above restaurant.

However, in fact, around June 18, 201, M did not sell shopping at the Gwangju New World Store with Defendant A, Defendant B, etc., and ② Defendant A, Defendant B, Defendant B, etc. performed shopping at the Gwangju New World Store, including clothes, and only carried out shopping at the above restaurant, and ③ Defendant A, Defendant B, etc. carried out a p, etc. at the above restaurant.

2. The perjury of Defendant B and the perjury of Defendant A

A. When the Defendant came to know that he was present as a witness of the instant case, around May 2013, he said that he was present at the general secretary office on the second floor of L Council building located in Q Q, and that “A would not give testimony on the fact between the fact and the Gwangju New World department store in June 18, 201,” and that “A shall not give testimony to the following.”

In his memory, such as paragraph (1).