beta
Text
1. The plaintiff's claims against the defendants are all dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
Reasons
1. Under the facts acknowledged, the facts below can be acknowledged as either a dispute between the parties or in full view of the following facts: Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 13, Eul evidence Nos. 1 through 10 (including the case of serial numbers), the market price appraisal results of appraiser F, and the purport of the whole pleadings as to the fact inquiry results of the G Union on April 21, 2016.
The real estate No. 1 on June 22, 1993, No. 1 on the date of registration of the No. 1 in the annexed list of the deceased H’s inherited property, No. 2 on June 22, 1993, the real estate No. 3 on September 24, 1986, No. 4 on September 24, 1986, the previous real estate No. 5 on the previous registration No. 4 on September 24, 1986, acquired each real estate No. D’s father net H (hereinafter “the deceased”) on March 14, 1995, as described in the annexed list, respectively.
B. On March 8, 2011, D purchased each real estate indicated in attached Table 2 bath details (hereinafter “instant bath”) and completed the registration of transfer of ownership under its own name (I on the register), and on March 24, 201, as to the bath bath in this case, D completed additional registration changing D (I on the register) to the debtor on the ground of acceptance of the contract as to the right to collateral security, which was established as of March 15, 2000, as of March 15, 201.
C. On January 20, 2013, the Deceased died. On the deceased’s heir, D and the Defendants were their wife E and children, and the statutory inheritance shares are as indicated below. The statutory inheritance shares are as indicated in the column of “legal inheritance” as indicated below, and the difference in the inheritance shares between E and E wife 3/93/93/91/93/93 (Defendant 1) and 2/93/93/99/99 (Defendant 2) and 2/93/93/999/9 (debtor 2/99) and 9/9/9/99/9/9/90 of the deceased’s inherited property as indicated in the separate sheet.
On March 12, 2013, the Plaintiff entered into a lease agreement with D on the instant bath owned by D with the lease term of two years, the lease deposit of 150,000,000 won, and the rent of 1,30,000 won per month.