logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2018.12.21 2017가단257139
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The Defendants jointly share KRW 87,050,00 for Plaintiff A, and KRW 10,000 for Plaintiff B and each of the said money.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. Defendant G Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant G Co., Ltd.”) related to the parties is a company that collects investments from many unspecified persons to engage in the business of fund-raising without permission, and Defendant C was the representative of the Defendant Co., Ltd., a similar recipient company from June 2016, and was in charge of the management of funds, decision-making on investment and other affairs.

Defendant D’s incidental list of the Defendant Company, Defendant E’s management director of the Defendant Company, and Defendant F, working for the Defendant Company as a director, were in charge of investor recruitment and investment management.

B. The Defendants’ act of receiving money and the Defendants’ act of receiving money without authorization, permission, or registration from the authorities, are likely to prevent the Defendant Company from doing business by regulating its business at any time because they were in collusion with investors at the head office or business branch of the Defendant Company, and (i) the period of the investment agreement was three months to make payment of 10% per month (7% per month from January 2, 2017) (the period of the investment agreement was changed to 14,184,490,000 won, including the Plaintiffs, for investment purposes; and (ii) the Defendant Company or the rest of the Defendants were engaged in a business without any special property or income; and (iii) there was a risk that the Defendant Company would not make business operations by regulating the authorities at any time; and (iv) Defendant C continued not to have been an expert in finance or investment with a short-term promise to investors for a short period of not more than three months; and (iii) Defendant C was not obliged to make a new contribution from the victims’ investment funds in the form of investment funds.

arrow