beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
1. On August 3, 2013, at around 12:45, the Defendant violated the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes) and the Road Traffic Act (Non-measures after an accident) (AF) operated a vehicle of Samsung F&M5 on a two-lane road at Seopo-si, Seopo-si, one-lane, at the entrance of Samsung F&M and a three-lane road at Seopo-dong. Since a yellow light boat is installed at the center, the front and right are well examined and the left are safely driven by safely driving the vehicle, despite the occupational duty of care to prevent the accident from occurring due to the negligence of the center line while driving the vehicle while driving the vehicle at a two-lane road, the part of the victim D(the 35 years old and the 35-year old and the part of the victim's right-hand vehicle in front and the part of the victim's right-hand vehicle in front of the 3-lane passenger vehicle.
As a result, the Defendant inflicted injury on the victim H (n, 8 years old), who is the passenger of the victim D and his vehicle, on the part of the victim H (n, 36 years old), and the victim I (n, 36 years old), and J (3 years old), who is the passenger of the victim F and his vehicle, on the part of the victim F, the victim I (n, 36 years old), and K (1 year old), on the part of the victim for about 3 weeks of medical treatment. At the same time, the Defendant suffered from the injury of climatic salt, etc. which requires approximately 2 weeks of medical treatment, and escaped without any necessary measures such as providing relief to the victims.
2. The Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (driving) at a distance of about 6 km from the Do near the 쇠n-dong in Seopo-si, Seopo-si, Seopo-si to the Defendant’s residence located in Seopo-si, Seopo-si, through the above accident site, driven the said SM5 car while under the influence of alcohol content of 0.159%.
Summary of Evidence
1. The defendant's statement in court;